| || |
Sign up for the Ferris News Service here
|News on messaging, collaboration, and compliance |
... email, spam and malware control, archiving, e-discovery, information leak prevention, unified communications, instant messaging, SharePoint, and mobile communications...
|Daily Digest: November 24, 2009|| |
|Archiving, E-Discovery, & Compliance|
|Email, Messaging & Collaboration|
Conferencing technology--such as Cisco WebEx and Microsoft Live Meeting--has two approaches to the audio element. You can route it over the data network, or you can route it over the conventional telephone system ("PSTN" or "Public Switched Telephone Network").
In principle, it's much better to treat the audio as just another data type for the conference and route it over a data network. This makes things much easier for users, because you can have tight integration with the conferencing application. No remembering and entering phone numbers, for example. And usually cheaper.
Internally, companies often run the audio part of conferencing over their in-house data network, because their internal network is fast enough and delivers data in a timely way. However, where participants must connect over public data networks, notably the public Internet, it's common to fall back on conventional telephony, because voice transmission over public data network connections often is not quite good enough for the audio part of a conferencing session (even though most of us have experienced pretty good voice quality at times via Skype).
There are two reasons for this audio-over-Internet shortfall:
When will the public Internet be good enough so that it's the default for the audio element of conferencing? Our current guess is around 2014 in most rich countries. In other places, probably quite a bit longer than that. Could be 2040 in some places.
However, that only applies to users who depend on the public Internet, with its best efforts/no promises level of Quality of Service (QoS). More and more businesses are buying Wide Area Ethernet services from telephone companies. Those are IP networks, like the public Internet, but unlike the public Internet they use quality-enhancing techniques like MPLS that reduce latency, lost packets and other QoS problems. Users of such services will likely be able to realize the full benefits of routing both the voice and data parts of a conferencing session together over a data network, long before it becomes the usual method for users who rely entirely on the public Internet. ... David Ferris, with thanks to Michael Tyler for his helpful input
|About Ferris Research|
Have news you want to share with us or product or interest area that you would like us to cover? Send press releases to email@example.com.
Copyright © Ferris Research 2009.