Ferris Research Free News
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
  Apr 15, Daily Compliance & Messaging News
Ferris Research Home
 

Sign up for the Ferris News Service here

News on messaging, content control, compliance, e-discovery, data leak prevention
Daily Digest: April 15, 2009
 
Content Control, Compliance, Archiving, E-Discovery, & Data Leak Prevention

Axway Fights Accidental Employee Data Leaks with New Hosted Messaging Encryption Solution Including True Message Recall
Hosted Encryption Offering Enables Strong, Policy-based Data Protection Without Upfront Infrastructure Costs; New Feature Enables Senders to Recall Sent Messages

Survey of Spam Control Products, and Survey of Archiving Products -- See what others think of these products/services. If you add your own data, we will send you a summary of the findings.

StoredIQ Secures $8 Million Financing, Adds eDiscovery and Information Management Veterans to Executive Team
Dan Junk, eDiscovery industry expert and lawyer, added as VP Business Development; Ellis Ishaya, accomplished customer services executive, formerly with Kazeon Systems and i365, joins as VP Partner Development

Messaging & Collaboration

Marshal8e6 Acquires Avinti to Add Behavioral Malware Detection
Acquisition Supports Company's Email and Web Security Strategy to Deliver Integrated Protection against Blended Threats

Funambol Open Source Cloud Sync and Push Email Powers Innovative Mobile Services for Tens of Millions of Users
Includes smart self-updating address book, free unlimited text messaging, free national directory, virtual digital content organizer and next-gen voice services

Trend Micro InterScan Security Virtual Appliances Are VMware Ready  

Axway Extends MailGate with Virtualized Offering
New delivery model reduces messaging security's physical footprint and cost

Blog Item(s)

Exchange 2010 Archiving: Summary & Assessment

Exchange 2010, announced on April 15, 2009, has built-in email archiving. In summary:

  • Tightly integrated with Outlook.
  • PSTs can be dragged and dropped into the archive.
  • Unified search across the live message store and the archive.
  • Search across multiple mailboxes for qualified staff.
  • Simple retention policies, based on the number of days of retention, can be defined. These policies can be defined to apply to a folder, individual messages, or an entire mailbox.
  • Legal holds can be imposed, overriding defined retention policy.
  • There's basic mailbox and configuration logs and auditing.
  • Stubbing's not used.

Other comments:

  • It's very good that Exchange now has built-in archiving. This will be welcomed by many people and organizations, because purchasing and supporting a third-party archiving product introduces complexity and requires resources.
  • This is a solid and attractive first step for Microsoft in email archiving.
  • The capability is a sound basis for future enhancements. Examples of areas which no doubt Microsoft will make up for current shortcomings include:
    • More powerful policy definition and enforcement for determining what gets archived, retention policies, and content tagging/labels. Today these facilties are rudimentary.
    • Integrated support for instant messaging, SharePoint, and Windows files and folders. Today only email, voice messages, and text messages are supported.
    • Integrated support for other archive repositories, such as Documentum.
  • You often end up going to PowerShell to implement controls. As these settle down, Microsoft will implement corresponding GUIs.
  • For the moment, third-party products will continue to be able to compete based on superior capabilities. Longer term, however, it's likely that the market for third-party email archiving technology for Exchange will gradually diminish.
  • We look forward to learning more about the archiving. There are plenty of open questions, such as:
    • How scalable is it?
    • How will it integrate with other archives?
    • Do PSTs go away?
    • How are messages ingested?
    • How important is the archiving in reducing the size of large mail stores, given that stubbing isn't used?

... David Ferris

(Comments?)


Exchange 2010: Exciting Message Store Performance and Redundancy Improvements

Maintaining the integrity of, and timely access to, a user's message store has been a major dilemma for Exchange over the years. Exchange lagged badly behind Lotus Notes/Domino because:

  • Lotus Notes employed a single OS file to hold a single user's mail file, while Exchange used a single "storage group" to hold multiple users' messages. This had the effect that a disk error affected many more users, and a restore from backup took much longer.
  • Exchange was much more disk I/O intensive, which meant that the likelihood of a disk error was increased.
  • Lotus Notes offered "shared nothing" multisite clustering, while Exchange only offered backup and restore.

This was largely a legacy of the environment for which Exchange was designed. The power of servers and the size of disks in the late 1980s meant that Exchange, like Notes in the early 1980s, was originally designed to support relatively small numbers of users per server, each with a relatively small message store. The effect of Moore's Law on both CPU power and RAM size, along with a 120% compound growth rate in disk bit density/cost, has meant that hardware is no longer a limiting factor. A single server is conceptually able to support many thousands of users, and disks many gigabytes of messages.

Unfortunately until its 2007 release, Exchange was largely hamstrung in its support of bigger servers and larger and cheaper disks. The problem was that Exchange was disk I/O limited. With the leap to "64-bit only" support in Exchange 2007, which resulted in a 60-70% reduction in disk I/O, and now with an additional 70% reduction in disk I/O under Exchange 2010, Exchange has finally broken free of its disk I/O straitjacket. In addition to increasing the number of users that can be supported per server, this reduction in disk I/O has the following knock on effects:

  • Exchange 2010 is able to employ much cheaper EDI (SATA) as opposed to SCSI and Fiber Channel disks. EDI disks trade-off an order of magnitude (1TB, SATA II @ $105 vs. 300GB, ULTRA SCSI @ $350) improvement in per-bit cost against poorer performance (7.2k RPM SATA II vs. 15k RPM, ULTRA SCSI) and reliability.
  • Exchange 2010 is able to support "shared nothing" replication, via "log replay," of mailbox databases both within and between data centers for load balancing and much more rapid post-disaster availability.

Collectively these changes deliver the following benefits:

  • They allow a backup/restore approach to disaster recovery to be replaced by a multicopy/multisite/online approach to disaster recovery.
    • Eliminating backup/restore enables much bigger mailboxes/message stores.
    • Supporting multicopy/multisite/online redundancy delivers much more rapid "disaster recovery."
  • They allow a switch to SATA drives. This delivers:
    • A near four-fold increase in mailbox/message store quotas/sizes.
    • A near four-fold increase in multisite data redundancy.
    • A near four-fold increase in disk density.
    • All at no increase in cost!
  • The multicopy/online approach to redundancy eliminates the need for RAID(1 or 5)-delivered redundancy. This is good news, because:
    • While theoretically, RAID-delivered redundancy should increase reliability, in practice, buggy RAID controller firmware and drivers often detect bogus errors requiring at best operator intervention, and at worst performance-sapping rebuilds, and even reboots!

Ferris is excited about these developments in Exchange 2010. They deliver considerable new benefits to the Exchange value proposition. At the same time, achieving the benefits requires a fairly major change of mindset among Exchange deployment architects. This is especially the case when replacing expensive SAN-based disk drives and SNAP-based backups with directly attached SATA disk drives and multisite replication. ... Nick Shelness

(Comments?)


Exchange 2010: Summary & Key Features

On April 15, 2009, Microsoft released a public beta of the next version of Exchange, Microsoft Exchange Server 2010. This has hitherto been known as Exchange 14, and been tested by some five million users via Microsoft's Outlook Live for Live@Edu program. General availability will be in 2H09.

For this author, the most important aspects of E2010 are:

  • Most of Exchange 2007 has been rewritten to better support large-scale deployments. Among other things, it has delegated administration with a much richer set of permissions. Far more work can now be pushed down to users and user-level administrators, with a lot of flexibility.
  • There is built-in archiving with retention policy and e-discovery support. Long term, this is likely to mean that the market for independent archiving products goes away. See our accompanying bulletin, Exchange 2010 Archiving: Summary & Assessment.
  • There's seamless coexistence between Exchange Online and Exchange 2010 implemented on-premises. This is very elegant, and based on a strong and innovative underlying identity architecture which we've discussed in other bulletins.
  • There's a centralized policy definition and management system. This is based on mainstream regular expression pattern matching and simple boolean logic, applying to message content and metadata, and for users and groups of users. Polices can be enforced manually or through user intervention. The policy framework is used in a variety of contexts, such as for data leak prevention, rights management, determining what is archived, and retention policy.
  • Quite a lot of features are rudimentary, such as the ability to define tags and control what's archived. However, the basic infrastructure is there, and there's a path for future enhancements to provide greater sophistication. Similarly, plenty of features are now implemented in PowerShell; more friendly GUIs will follow later.

E2010 has many other improvements, many of which will be appreciated by users or administrators. They include:

  • The Windows Mobile experience is now very close to that of desktop Outlook.
  • With "MailTips," users are automatically warned about potential faux pas when an an email is about to be sent, such as when a distribution list will cause it to be received by a very large number of people, or when the email is so large it's likely to bounce, or when recipients are out of the office.
  • OWA now supports all the main browsers including Safari and Firefox, not just IE.
  • Email conversations are much easier to manage via the updated Conversation View.
  • Voicemail previews: Text previews are generated of voicemail in Outlook, OWA, and Outlook Mobile. This saves a lot of time when quickly scanning through voice messages.
  • Free/busy times can be exchanged with outside parties, not just internal colleagues, with due privacy controls.
  • User-customizable voicemail menu hierarchies.
  • Much reduced I/O and much more flexible storage options. Continuous replication over WANs is now practical, and provides much faster recovery for damaged message stores. There is generally better resilience in case of system failure. See our accompanying bulletin, Exchange 2010: Exciting Message Store Performance and Redundancy Improvements, for a detailed assessment.
  • Much faster mailbox moves; can be done while users are online, during regular business hours.

Other Comments:

  • Microsoft points out that a number of these features help address the problem of mailbox overload, such as MailTips, Voicemail previews, the conversation management tools, the call answering rules, and the rich and consistent Windows/OWA/mobile experience. All of these are welcome and good developments. However, don't expect email overload to go away.

... David Ferris

(Comments?)


Latest Buzz ... Email Archive Migration: Plan for Stubbing

Below are various active gossip threads on current events in the industry. To contribute information, follow the appropriate link or see our Gossip page for other vendor threads.


Upcoming Webcasts

Recent Messaging and Collaboration Fundings
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
8:30 a.m. Pacific, 11:30 a.m. Eastern, 4:30 p.m. U.K., 5:30 p.m. CET. One hour.

The severe global recession has made it difficult for emerging companies to raise money. The number of fundings is roughly half its normal rate, and valuations are similarly reduced. In this webcast, we speak with Marc Olson of Nayatek and Tal Golan of Sendio, two messaging companies that recently completed a funding round. They'll discuss, among other things, how they raised the money, the main investor concerns, and how the funds were used. They'll also provide advice on fund-raising do's and don'ts.

To register for the webcast, click here. For more information, click here.

Recent Research

Recent Reports Available:

For more reports, visit our reports page.

Recent Ferris Webcasts:

About Ferris Research

Ferris Research studies messaging, and the control of electronic information. More specifically, we help IT staff evaluate and implement products and services that:

  • Provide messaging and collaborative technologies
  • Archive electronic information
  • Ensure compliance with corporate policy, industry regulations, and laws
  • Facilitate e-discovery, and contain its costs
  • Reduce the dangers of information leaks

Email is the most important type of electronic information that requires control today. Other important types include instant messages, Sharepoint teamspaces, images, voice, video, and miscellaneous desktop files.

We've been in business since 1990--longer than any other analyst firm in our field:

  • Clients include 300 of the world's 1,000 largest organizations, and computer vendors from the largest corporations to small startups
  • While other analysts have come and gone, we've published more than 200 formal reports and 1,100 short bulletins
  • Our news service covers more than 2,000 highly specialized announcements annually
  • We have nine experts in our research team, sharing many decades of experience in our core competencies

In short, our technology and industry depth helps you understand today's products, where they've come from and where they're going.


Have news you want to share with us or product or interest area that you would like us to cover? Send press releases to releases@ferris.com.

Copyright © Ferris Research 2008.


 


Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home
Lets anyone with a professional interest in messaging and collaboration keep up with the news and key trends ... To sign up, go to www.ferris.com ... If you want a version that includes analysis of the news and puts everything in a single email, subscribe to our Analyzer Information Service ... Got some news you want to share with us? Send press releases and conference announcements relevant to messaging to releases@ferris.com ... Copyright © Ferris Research 2005-2006.

ARCHIVES
September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / March 2011 / March 2012 /


Powered by Blogger