Ferris Research Free News
Friday, July 25, 2008
  Jul 25, Daily Compliance & Messaging News
Ferris Research Home
 

Sign up for the Ferris News Service here

News on messaging, content control, compliance, e-discovery, data leak prevention
Daily Digest: July 25, 2008  
 
Content Control, Compliance, Archiving, E-Discovery, & Data Leak Prevention

Survey of Archiving Products -- Let us know what you think about the archiving products you use. If you add your own data, we will send you a summary of the findings. The survey just started--great if you can help get this off the ground by contributing your own policies

Survey of Retention Policies -- See the retention policies for various organizations here. If you add your own data, we will send you a summary of the findings

AXS-One Named as Top-Ranked E-Discovery Software Provider
Triple Top 5 Ranking in 2008 Socha-Gelbmann E-Discovery Report underscores industry adoption of AXS-One e-discovery solutions

Orchestria Partners with Voltage Security to Protect Email
Integrates Email Encryption Technology into Orchestria 6

 
Messaging & Collaboration

GSS Migration Toolkit for Sun Communications Suite enables migration from IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to Web 2.0 and SaaS  

Blog Item(s)

Foldering vs. Search

There's an argument that says: Keeping information in the right folders is too much work. Plus, you always want to look at the same information in other ways, and having it kept in folders makes it harder to find. So don't bother foldering. Instead, expect to use a search engine. Put another way: Don't bother to categorize electronically stored information; let search engines do that work for you.

This argument does seem to apply to a lot of electronically stored information. However, sometimes it doesn't. For example, sometimes it just takes too much time to run the search engine and fiddle with search criteria until you find what you want. Sometimes folders and categorization/tagging just feel like a far better solution.

One common approach is to automatically categorize email. However, this is often rather inaccurate.

Recommind's Decisiv Email is a useful tool that helps categorize email. Foldering is done manually, but is machine-assisted:

  • It suggests suitable places you can file email, based on TO, FROM, CC, Subject, Content, and your past filing preferences.
  • It displays a ranking/confidence level for each suggestion.
  • Multiple categories/folders are possible, but only a copy of the original is kept.
  • You can see what's been filed, and what hasn't been.
  • Users can easily browse the various folders.
  • Users can define their folder structure.
  • Emails are filed into Recommind's own repository, facilitating search and sharing.
  • Access controls apply to messages, so privacy is maintained.
  • It works via an Outlook plugin.

When manual categorization is required, machine assistance is clearly the way to go. ... David Ferris

(Comments?)


Email Overload: Declaring Email Bankruptcy

There is a new phenomenon happening behind closed doors in the corporate world. We call it email bankruptcy.

To illustrate, we would challenge you to an experiment. Assuming your email policies allow this, we dare you to simply delete all the email in your inbox that is older than three days and see if it causes you much grief. All of it.

Then wait for 10 days and see how much of it was really important.

Lest you think us extreme, we think you will be surprised with how much of the "work" represented by those emails simply "goes away." After all, much of what is in your inbox represents other people’s priorities, which are usually not the same as yours.

We are hearing of more and more people who have added a regular declaration of email bankruptcy to their strategies in trying to cope with information overload.

Taming your inbox is hard, but it's a necessary step if you are to increase your productivity and sanity. ... David Sengupta

(Comments?)

 

Recent Research

Recent Reports Available:

For more reports, visit our reports page.

Recent Ferris Webinars:

About Ferris Research

Ferris Research studies messaging, and the control of electronic information. More specifically, we help IT staff evaluate and implement products and services that:

  • Provide messaging and collaborative technologies
  • Archive electronic information
  • Ensure compliance with corporate policy, industry regulations, and laws
  • Facilitate e-discovery, and contain its costs
  • Reduce the dangers of information leaks

Email is the most important type of electronic information that requires control today. Other important types include instant messages, Sharepoint teamspaces, images, voice, video, and miscellaneous desktop files.

We've been in business since 1990--longer than any other analyst firm in our field:

  • Clients include 300 of the world's 1,000 largest organizations, and computer vendors from the largest corporations to small startups
  • While other analysts have come and gone, we've published more than 200 formal reports and 1,100 short bulletins
  • Our news service covers more than 2,000 highly specialized announcements annually
  • We have nine experts in our research team, sharing many decades of experience in our core competencies

In short, our technology and industry depth helps you understand today's products, where they've come from and where they're going.


Have news you want to share with us or product or interest area that you would like us to cover? Send press releases to releases@ferris.com.

Copyright © Ferris Research 2008.


 


Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home
Lets anyone with a professional interest in messaging and collaboration keep up with the news and key trends ... To sign up, go to www.ferris.com ... If you want a version that includes analysis of the news and puts everything in a single email, subscribe to our Analyzer Information Service ... Got some news you want to share with us? Send press releases and conference announcements relevant to messaging to releases@ferris.com ... Copyright © Ferris Research 2005-2006.

ARCHIVES
September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / March 2011 / March 2012 /


Powered by Blogger